Moksha Patam: The Moral History Behind Snakes and Ladders
Snakes and Ladders began in India as a game about virtue, karma and liberation. Here is how it changed on its way to Victorian Britain and modern living rooms.
Snakes and Ladders looks like the simplest game ever designed. There are no decisions at all. You roll a die, move your token, climb if you land on a ladder and slide if you land on a snake. It is pure chance from start to finish. And yet, this little race has one of the most interesting histories of any board game, because for most of its life it was not really a game about winning. It was a game about how to live.
A board of virtues and vices
The game we know descends from a family of Indian boards often called Moksha Patam or Gyan Chaupar. Moksha refers to liberation from the cycle of birth and rebirth, one of the central ideas in several Indian religious traditions. The board was a map of a spiritual journey.
On these old boards, the squares were labelled with qualities, actions and states of mind. Ladders started on virtues such as generosity, faith or knowledge, and carried the player upwards. Snakes began on vices such as anger, theft or pride, and dragged the player down. The final square represented liberation itself.
Different traditions created different versions. There are Hindu, Jain and Sufi boards, each with their own lists of virtues and vices and their own artwork. Some boards were painted on cloth, others on paper. Many included elaborate illustrations of gods, heavens and hells. The authorship of the game is often attributed to a thirteenth-century poet-saint, but like many old games, its true origins are hard to pin down.
Why chance mattered
Modern players sometimes find it strange that a moral teaching tool would be based entirely on chance. Surely good behaviour should be rewarded and bad behaviour punished, rather than leaving it to the roll of shells or dice?
The answer lies in how the game connected to ideas about karma and fate. Players could not control where they landed, just as people cannot control every circumstance of their lives. What the board showed was the consequence of each state. Landing on generosity lifted you up. Landing on cruelty brought you down. The lesson was not "you can win by being clever", but "this is how actions shape a life".
Old boards often had more snakes than ladders. That was not an accident. The path to liberation was understood to be difficult, and the board reflected that. The long snake near the top, which still appears on modern boards, carried a clear message: even someone who is close to the goal can fall.
Arrival in Britain
In the late nineteenth century, the game travelled to Britain, like Pachisi before it. Victorian manufacturers kept the moral framing for a while. Early British boards labelled squares with virtues and vices relevant to a Christian, middle-class audience: obedience, industry and thrift on one side; idleness, disobedience and indulgence on the other. Children climbed ladders by being good and slid down snakes for being naughty.
Over time, the moral labels faded. Boards became simply colourful grids with numbers, snakes and ladders. The game turned from a lesson into a pastime, though the essential imagery remained.
Chutes and Ladders
In the United States, a version called Chutes and Ladders appeared in the 1940s. Snakes, which some felt might frighten young children, were replaced by playground slides. The artwork often showed children doing good deeds at the bottom of ladders and minor misdeeds at the top of chutes, a gentle echo of the original moral design.
The maths of a game without choices
Because Snakes and Ladders involves no decisions, it is a favourite of mathematicians. The whole game can be modelled as what is called a Markov chain: every square has a fixed set of probabilities for where you will be after the next roll. From this, people have calculated the average number of turns a game lasts, the most commonly landed-on squares, and the probability of finishing within a certain number of moves.
These calculations reveal something interesting. Even though the game feels wildly unpredictable, its overall shape is quite stable. On a typical board, most solo games end within a range of a few dozen turns, with a long tail of unlucky games that take much longer. The precise numbers depend on where the snakes and ladders are placed. Designers can make a board feel generous or cruel just by moving a few of them.
Why it still appeals
If you strip away the history, you are left with a game that a three-year-old can play. That is its strength. It is often the very first board game children learn. It teaches counting, turn-taking and how to cope with sudden reversals of fortune. Adults play it with children not for the challenge, but for the shared moments: the cheer when someone hits a long ladder, the dramatic slide down the big snake.
There is also something quietly philosophical about it, even today. Everyone starts at the same place. Everyone faces the same board. Fortune lifts some people up and brings others down, and the winner is not necessarily the best person, only the one who reaches the top first. The original designers would probably recognise that lesson.
Playing it today
The 3D Snake and Ladder board on Xons Play keeps the classic structure: one hundred squares, a zig-zag path, eight ladders and eight snakes, and the exact roll needed to land on the final square. The snakes are fully modelled, with tapered bodies and patterned skin, and pawns hop square by square so younger players can follow the counting.
It is worth telling children the story of Moksha Patam while you play. A ladder becomes a little more meaningful when you know it once represented kindness, and a snake a little more memorable when you know it once stood for greed. A game that started as a lesson about life still has room for a lesson or two.
Ready to put this into practice?Play Snake & Ladder free